<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roger Bohn&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://art2science.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://art2science.org</link>
	<description>How technologies evolve from Art to Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='art2science.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://art2science.org/osd.xml" title="Roger Bohn&#039;s Blog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://art2science.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m switching WordPress themes</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/12/09/im-switching-wordpress-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/12/09/im-switching-wordpress-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 02:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.wordpress.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the site may be disrupted for a few days. More important, I&#8217;m going to add material about my primary research on Art and Science.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=412&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/12/09/im-switching-wordpress-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Bohn &#8211; Google Scholar Citations</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/11/28/roger-bohn-google-scholar-citations/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/11/28/roger-bohn-google-scholar-citations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art to science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductor & electronics industries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Bohn &#8211; Google Scholar Citations. Google does its usual amazing job of organizing information. They have a &#8220;scholar&#8221; page for every academic, with their best guess of all the papers written, and how many times they were cited. In &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/11/28/roger-bohn-google-scholar-citations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=409&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/11/28/roger-bohn-google-scholar-citations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classic definition of recession no longer useful</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/11/17/classic-definition-of-recession-no-longer-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/11/17/classic-definition-of-recession-no-longer-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We now need 2 separate concepts of recession. &#8220;Total GDP recession&#8221; is the conventional one. &#8220;Actual people recession&#8221; is the one that matters to almost everyone. The rationale is that all of the &#8220;growth&#8221; after the 2001 recession, and this &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/11/17/classic-definition-of-recession-no-longer-useful/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=403&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/11/17/classic-definition-of-recession-no-longer-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5069/5888544266_b138a059ec.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">job recovery time</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiscal FactCheck: payroll tax = income tax!</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/07/17/fiscal-factcheck-payroll-tax-income-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/07/17/fiscal-factcheck-payroll-tax-income-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiscal FactCheck. Astonishing fact is buried here: Payroll taxes (social security, medicare etc) have almost caught up with federal income tax. Payroll taxes are 40% of federal receipts in 2010, while personal income tax was 41.5%. Payroll taxes tend to &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/07/17/fiscal-factcheck-payroll-tax-income-tax/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=395&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/07/17/fiscal-factcheck-payroll-tax-income-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short-attention spans; does anyone still THINK?</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/06/08/short-attention-spans-does-anyone-still-think/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/06/08/short-attention-spans-does-anyone-still-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Much Information?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spoke yesterday at The Economist conference, Information: Making Sense of the Deluge. Very interesting speakers, I was excited to go. The stated and sincere intent was to get a  discussion going, including the audience. But the format was like &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/06/08/short-attention-spans-does-anyone-still-think/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=381&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/06/08/short-attention-spans-does-anyone-still-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world&#8217;s servers processed 9570000000000000000000 bytes in 2008</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/05/05/hmi-servers/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/05/05/hmi-servers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 06:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Much Information?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently completed another major &#8220;How Much Information?&#8221; report. This one measures how much information servers processed, worldwide.  Answer: we estimated 9.57 ZB in 2008. The coverage was broad, although not as much general press as our previous report on &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/05/05/hmi-servers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=374&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/05/05/hmi-servers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Researchers Study the World&#8217;s Information Explosion &#8211; The Numbers Guy &#8211; WSJ</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/02/19/researchers-study-the-worlds-information-explosion-the-numbers-guy-wsj/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/02/19/researchers-study-the-worlds-information-explosion-the-numbers-guy-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 02:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Much Information?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguments over what information to measure, and how are fundamentally irresolvable. There are too many good answers, and for most purposes measurement problems make it impossible to measure exactly what we want, in any case. The WSJ&#8217;s &#8220;numbers guy&#8221; collects &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/02/19/researchers-study-the-worlds-information-explosion-the-numbers-guy-wsj/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=372&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/02/19/researchers-study-the-worlds-information-explosion-the-numbers-guy-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm and Intel: Why are industrial companies so bad at consumer products?</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/02/18/qualcomm-and-intel-why-are-industrial-companies-so-bad-at-consumer-products/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/02/18/qualcomm-and-intel-why-are-industrial-companies-so-bad-at-consumer-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiconductor & electronics industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qualcomm is trying to bring out consumer products, and failing &#8212; Flo TV, and more on the way. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with initiatives that fail, especially when you are as rich as QC, but they are making systematic errors. Intel &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/02/18/qualcomm-and-intel-why-are-industrial-companies-so-bad-at-consumer-products/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=366&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/02/18/qualcomm-and-intel-why-are-industrial-companies-so-bad-at-consumer-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>JAMA &#8212; Ensuring Integrity in Industry-Sponsored Research: Primum Non Nocere, Revisited, March 24/31, 2010, DeAngelis and Fontanarosa 303 12: 1196</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2011/01/28/jama-ensuring-integrity-in-industry-sponsored-research-primum-non-nocere-revisited-march-2431-2010-deangelis-and-fontanarosa-303-12-1196/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2011/01/28/jama-ensuring-integrity-in-industry-sponsored-research-primum-non-nocere-revisited-march-2431-2010-deangelis-and-fontanarosa-303-12-1196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evidence on false conclusions from drug trials, and their publications, is mounting. I am forced to the conclusion that, most likely, 1) This has been going on for a long time; the big change is that it&#8217;s occasionally getting &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2011/01/28/jama-ensuring-integrity-in-industry-sponsored-research-primum-non-nocere-revisited-march-2431-2010-deangelis-and-fontanarosa-303-12-1196/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=267&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2011/01/28/jama-ensuring-integrity-in-industry-sponsored-research-primum-non-nocere-revisited-march-2431-2010-deangelis-and-fontanarosa-303-12-1196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airplane fires are still &#8220;craft&#8221; stage</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2010/11/12/airplane-fires-are-still-craft-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://art2science.org/2010/11/12/airplane-fires-are-still-craft-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>art2science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art to science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just presented some of my research on how flying went from Art to Science, at the INFORMS conference. (Very short paper  at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sj362h9. Long working paper is coming soon.)  My colleague Erica Fuchs related a recent experience that demonstrates &#8230; <a href="http://art2science.org/2010/11/12/airplane-fires-are-still-craft-stage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=art2science.org&amp;blog=8151768&amp;post=343&amp;subd=art2science&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://art2science.org/2010/11/12/airplane-fires-are-still-craft-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f60d6d7b7c5b95e83b4565b476245ce?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">art2science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
