<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist praises a dangerous and obsolete management concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://art2science.org/2009/09/14/the-economist-praises-a-dangerous-and-obsolete-management-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://art2science.org/2009/09/14/the-economist-praises-a-dangerous-and-obsolete-management-concept/</link>
	<description>How technologies evolve from Art to Science - which changes everything about them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schneider</title>
		<link>http://art2science.org/2009/09/14/the-economist-praises-a-dangerous-and-obsolete-management-concept/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Schneider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://art2science.org/?p=31#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm... not sure I completely agree. The experience curve was never supposed to be the &#039;single law&#039; that ruled all laws. It suggested that over time (and with experience) the corporation had the opportunity to become more efficient. It didn&#039;t mandate that ALL of them did. 

Coupling the experience curve with other issues (GM&#039;s union problems,etc.) is a bit of a red herring. In addition, the experience curve was fundamentally about &#039;learning&#039; (such as what Toyota did with JIT).   

Just my humble opinion...
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; not sure I completely agree. The experience curve was never supposed to be the &#8216;single law&#8217; that ruled all laws. It suggested that over time (and with experience) the corporation had the opportunity to become more efficient. It didn&#8217;t mandate that ALL of them did. </p>
<p>Coupling the experience curve with other issues (GM&#8217;s union problems,etc.) is a bit of a red herring. In addition, the experience curve was fundamentally about &#8216;learning&#8217; (such as what Toyota did with JIT).   </p>
<p>Just my humble opinion&#8230;<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

